Military physicians provide data that indicate service members are being injured by COVID-19 vaccines

by mcardinal

Lauren Dempsey, MS in Biomedicine and Law, RN, FISM News 

 

Last week at a COVID -19 panel, three military doctors presented information that they said pointed to a surge in adverse medical effects from the vaccine.

In response to many health care workers expressing concern over vaccine mandates and the lack of outpatient treatment options available to individuals, Senator Ron Johnson hosted “Covid-19: A Second Opinion.” The meeting was framed as a discussion that allowed doctors, nurses, and medical experts to share their personal experiences from the field and included information on the current treatments available, vaccine safety and efficacy, and what should be done moving forward.

Attorney Thomas Renz, who has filed lawsuits on behalf of America’s Frontline Doctors against the Biden administration’s vaccine mandates, spoke at this panel. He is currently representing three whistleblower military physicians: Dr. Samuel Sigoloff, Dr. Peter Chambers, and Dr. Theresa Long. These doctors have voiced concern in data they found when analyzing the Defense Medical Surveillance System.

This database says it “contains up-to-date and historical data on diseases and medical events” that can be used to search for data that pertains to “disease and injury rates and relative burdens of disease, for active component service members.”

According to Renz, the information provided from the physicians indicated that there was a surge of adverse medical events following the vaccine mandate for service members when compared to previous years. They believe that there is a direct correlation between vaccination and the increase in miscarriages, myocarditis, cancer diagnoses, Bell’s palsy, female infertility.

 According to the information that was discovered, there was a 300% increase in cancer diagnosis and miscarriages, a 1,000% increase in neurological issues, a 269% increase in myocardial infarction, a 291% increase in Bell’s palsy, a 156% increase in congenital malformations of military members’ children, a 471% increase in female infertility, and a 467% increase in pulmonary embolisms. 

These numbers represent the total number of diagnoses that were reported individually, they are not measured by the individual, meaning that a service member could potentially be suffering from multiple disease processes. 

This is not the first time that forced vaccination and the subsequent increase in adverse reactions has happened. In 1991, during the Persian Gulf War, military members began receiving the anthrax vaccine, with it becoming mandatory for service members in 1998. However, in 1999, after military members voiced concern over a rise in adverse reactions, Congress directed the CDC to develop the Anthrax Vaccine Research Program (AVRP) to study the safety of the vaccine and its effectiveness. 

The United States General Accounting Office conducted a survey from 1998 through 2000, which revealed that 85% of troops who received an anthrax shot had an adverse reaction which was higher than the 30% claimed by the manufacturer in 2000, and 16% had either left the military or changed their status, at least in part because of the mandatory vaccination requirement. 

Despite this history and the current spike in medical issues amongst service members, the Department of Defense (DoD) insists that vaccination is the best way to protect America’s military members and American citizens. Many, however, argue that the poor efficacy of the vaccine contradicts this methodology, since the vaccine neither prevents infection or the spread of the virus in vaccinated individuals and levels of immunity drastically wane within months of vaccination.  

The video of the panel posted by Sen. Johnson can be seen here.

DONATE NOW